Search found 10 matches
- Sat 06 May, 2017 3:26 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Feature request: revamping config files
- Replies: 53
- Views: 36712
Re: Feature request: revamping config files
I cannot compile it, but would love the try the binary. Thanks.
- Tue 02 May, 2017 3:54 pm
- Forum: Development
- Topic: Mach64 VT2
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7192
Re: Mach64 VT2
Matrox boards were known for their RAMDAC and 2D quality, none of which matters when you are emulating a video card. They weren't actually all that compatible with DOS resolutions, but did excel in Windows.
https://gona.mactar.hu/DOS_TESTS/
https://gona.mactar.hu/DOS_TESTS/
- Tue 11 Apr, 2017 9:19 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: A little wishlist if I may...
- Replies: 10
- Views: 8645
Re: A little wishlist if I may...
That's much less a glitch and more of an intended design. Personally I like it that way so I can always go back to what I launched with before after minor tweaking (i.e. testing) cool, its not a big deal to me either way. Not like I need to run it more than one at a time anyways :) It's a big deal ...
- Fri 07 Apr, 2017 9:01 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Feature request: revamping config files
- Replies: 53
- Views: 36712
Re: Feature request: revamping config files
Has a remedy to the multi-config files been pushed to any dev update by chance? That feature would be a life-saver for me. It would allow me to build my different classic PC's without stomping on each other.
- Mon 27 Mar, 2017 9:43 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: DOSBox vs. PCem – What plays DOS games better/more accurate?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 16756
Re: DOSBox vs. PCem – What plays DOS games better/more accurate?
I haven't investigated it yet, but does PCEM offer the ability to offload MIDI to a hardware MIDI device? That's my favorite feature of DOSBox.
- Fri 24 Feb, 2017 1:32 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Feature request: revamping config files
- Replies: 53
- Views: 36712
Re: Feature request: revamping config files
YES! The config file architecture is very annoying. Everything defaults to pcem.cfg when saving. I've had to resort to making multiple copies of the whole folder with all extraneous rom/bios files just to accommodate different emulated PC's. Well the intention was that you'd save different configs ...
- Thu 23 Feb, 2017 3:25 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Feature request: revamping config files
- Replies: 53
- Views: 36712
Re: Feature request: revamping config files
YES! The config file architecture is very annoying. Everything defaults to pcem.cfg when saving. I've had to resort to making multiple copies of the whole folder with all extraneous rom/bios files just to accommodate different emulated PC's. Another thing I notice is if I put in a relative path to t...
- Tue 24 Jan, 2017 11:31 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: IBM PS/1 model 2121 help
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7237
Re: IBM PS/1 model 2121 help
Use Bochs/Linux/DosBOX to create a HDD the PS/1 bios recognizes - I used 80Mb with 981/10/7 for CHS since that was my model. Set the parameters in PCEM appropriately. 386SX/16 for example. Get the right fc8000.bin rom Google "IBM PS/1 Resource page" (Alternatively, you can just use that IB...
- Tue 24 Jan, 2017 3:30 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: IBM PS/1 model 2121 help
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7237
Re: IBM PS/1 model 2121 help
And in typical Internet fashion, I got it working perfectly right after I posted this. Ugh.
This is so cool!
This is so cool!
- Tue 24 Jan, 2017 2:27 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: IBM PS/1 model 2121 help
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7237
IBM PS/1 model 2121 help
I'm trying to get the IBM PS/1 2121 386SX-16 to work. I believe I have the right ROM, the right HDD image and everything, but all I get is the Press F1 to continue and then an error loading operating system. I'm trying to duplicate the first PC I ever owned, the 2121-B82. http://ps-2.kev009.com/pcpa...