v17 compatibility & bug list

Discussion of development and patch submission.
G-Man
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon 04 Jan, 2021 2:29 pm

Re: v17 compatibility & bug list

Post by G-Man »

Working:

Code: Select all

Solaris 2.5.1
	Shuttle HOT-557, Pentium 200MMX, 128MB RAM, IDE, ATI Graphics Pro Turbo (Mach64 GX)(4MB), SB 16, Microsoft 2-button mouse (serial)

Solaris 2.6
	Shuttle HOT-557, Pentium 200MMX, 128MB RAM, IDE, ATI Graphics Pro Turbo (Mach64 GX)(4MB), SB 16, Microsoft 2-button mouse (serial)

Solaris 7.0
	Shuttle HOT-557, Pentium 200MMX, 128MB RAM, IDE, ATI Graphics Pro Turbo (Mach64 GX)(4MB), SB 16, Microsoft 2-button mouse (serial)
Attachments
Screenshot from 2021-01-12 16-47-28.png
Screenshot from 2021-01-12 16-47-28.png (23.59 KiB) Viewed 850 times
Screenshot from 2021-01-12 16-54-38.png
Screenshot from 2021-01-12 16-54-38.png (33.67 KiB) Viewed 850 times
Screenshot from 2021-01-12 17-05-12.png
Screenshot from 2021-01-12 17-05-12.png (42.43 KiB) Viewed 850 times
caiot5
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat 09 Jan, 2021 3:41 am

Re: v17 compatibility & bug list

Post by caiot5 »

Well, hello Sarah (and of course other contributors), first things first: I want to thank you for your HUGE efforts of coding PCem.
I know that it is a really complex thing, and you guys (and girls) did an amazing job.
However I would just report that the Dynamic Recompiler of v17 looks completely broken (or kind of) on macOS.
All the machines that relies on Dynarec (such as Pentium-class machines) are REALLY slow.
I can confirm that without Dynarec it works the same (or better) than v16 did.
I know that there is no official support for macOS because the lack of interest on it and I know that you must have a ton of more important things to do instead of troubleshooting PCem for a OS that just a few PCem users actually use.
So it is just to report it.
I'll just keep using v16 for now.

Thanks, peace ^^
Caio
Post Reply